J. Life Sci. Biomed. 6(4): 94-99, July 25, 2016  
JLSB  
Journal of  
ISSN 2251-9939  
Life Science and Biomedicine  
Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions in Prevention of Gastroeshophageal  
Bleeding in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis  
Babadjanov Azam Khasanovich1 , Djumaniyazov Djavakhir Azadovich1, Ruziboev Sandjar Abdusamatovich2,  
Baibekov Renat Ravilevich 1 and Salimov Umid Ravshanovich 1  
1Republican Specialized Surgery Centre named after Academician V.Vakhidov, Tashkent City, Uzbekistan  
2Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Tashkent City, Uzbekistan  
Corresponding author's Email: azam746@mail.ru  
ABSTRACT: To analyze the survival of patients with liver cirrhosis, and to assess the effectiveness of  
endoscopic interventions in the prevention of portal genesis bleedings. To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic  
interventions, our study included 449 liver cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension in the period from 1996 to  
2015, admitted with bleeding from variceal bleedings or the threat of its recurrence. All patients were divided into 2  
groups of the study. The main group included 239 patients treated between 2008 and 2015 in the control group -  
210 patients in the period from 1996 to 2007. The analysis showed that the percentage of patients without  
recurrence of variceal bleeding when performing only endoscopic interventions was 27% (33 patients) in the  
control group and 54.2% (64) in the main group. With the phased tactics of portosystemic shunt performance  
after endoscopic interventions this figure amounted to 32.4% (45) and 109 (61.6%). In the structure of  
mortality of patients without cirrhosis in the long-term period (81 patients) with endoscopic interventions  
recurrence of bleeding were observed in 40.7% (33) cases in the control group and 68.1% (64 of 94) in the  
main group. In turn, when combined endoscopy and portosystemic shunting in the structure of the patients,  
without counting deaths from progressive liver cirrhosis, the proportion of absence of recurrence was 45.9%  
(in 45 of 98 patients) and 71.2% (in 102 out of 153 tracked in the remote period excluding deaths from  
cirrhosis). In the group of patients that do not carry out any endoscopic intervention and the patients received  
only conservative therapy only in 3 (10.7%) cases it was possible to avoid recurrence of bleeding, which  
determines the therapeutic ineffectiveness isolated attempts to reduce the risk of recurrence of hemorrhagic  
syndrome. Modern possibilities of endoscopic technologies have significantly improved the results of  
treatment and prevention of varicose bleeding or the threat of its recurrence, and the commitment to the  
phased tactics, with a combination of minimally invasive and traditional decompressive surgery, allowed to  
increase the survival rates of patients with 80% to 88% - up to 1 year and from 42% to 64% - to 3 years of  
follow-up.  
Author Keywords: Liver Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension Syndrome, Bleeding From Esophageal And Gastric  
Varices, Portosystemic Shunting, Endoscopic Ligation, Endoscopic Sclerotherapy.  
INTRODUCTION  
In modern hepatology chronic diffuse liver diseases are still relevant socio-epidemiological and clinical health  
problem [1, 2]. Bleeding from varicose veins of the esophagus and stomach (VVES) occurs in 80% of patients with  
liver cirrhosis (LC) with portal hypertension (PH) and is the most common and life-threatening complications [3,  
4, 5]. The risk of its development during the first two years after the identification of the transformation of  
varicose veins of the esophagus is 30%, while the annual hemorrhagic syndrome develops in 12-15% of patients  
with VVES [6]. Mortality from the first bleeding ranges from 30 up to 60%, and within decompensated liver  
function reaches 76-100% [7,8].  
The only radical treatment method is a liver transplantation, but in the absence of indications for  
transplantation, or because of impossibility of its performance within social and law issues, the main focus of the  
surgical treatment of these patients is the prevention of bleeding [9, 10].  
Among the entire spectrum of surgical interventions, used in treatment and prevention of bleeding,  
minimally invasive technologies are of special interest. In this series, the most promising and competitive are the  
various techniques of endoscopic interventions on VVES. The development of these technologies brought them  
To cite this paper: Babadjanov A.Kh. Djumaniyazov D.A., Ruziboev S.A., Baibekov R.R. and Salimov U.R. 2016. Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions in Prevention of  
Gastroeshophageal Bleeding in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. J. Life Sci. Biomed., 6 (4): 94-99.  
94  
into the category of "first-line method", as in bleeding altitude so do in patients with high risk for its development  
[13, 14].  
MATERIALS AND METHODS  
The study included 449 patients with LC and PH admitted with bleeding from VVES or with the threat of its  
recurrence. Observation period was held from 1996 to 2015. All patients were divided into 2 groups of the study.  
The study group included 239 patients who received treatment between 2008 and 2015 in the control group -  
210 patients which were observed between 1996 and 2007. In the main group endoscopic procedures have been  
used much more widely, both for prevention and for emergency indications. Endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES) was  
applied in 332 (73.9%) patients. Endoscopic ligation (EL) in117 (26.1%) patients.  
In the control group 102 patients were admitted in emergency order, and 119 - in the main group. Routinely  
hospitalized 108 and 120 patients, respectively. Age ranged from 19 to 66 years. The median age was 31.2 years.  
The men were 289 (64.3%), women - 160 (35.7%). During the emergency endoscopy esophageal varices was the  
source of bleeding in 81 (79.4%) patients in the control group and in 91 (76.5%) patients in the study group.  
Gastric cardia variceal bleeding (GC) was determined in 21 (20.6%) and 28 (23.5%) cases, respectively. In the  
early posthemorrhagic period 76 portosystemic shunt (PSS) were carried out in both groups, 19 - in the control  
group and 57 in the main. All patients had 1-2 sessions of endoscopic interventions with effective hemostasis and  
subsequent preoperative preparation to perform PSS in terms of 6 to 25 days after the bleeding.  
The majority of patients had selective anastomosis performed - the distal splenorenal anastomosis (DSRA) -  
49 (64.5%). Central anastomosis where performed in 27 (35.5%). In the group of central shunts performed  
splenosuprarenal anastomosis, laterolateral splenorenal, and H-shaped graft anastomosis with inserting of the  
internal jugular vein were performed.  
RESULTS  
In our observations, an effective endoscopic hemostasis was achieved in 76 (74.5%) patients in the control group,  
and in 84.9% (101 patients) in the study group, (Table. 1). In the GC bleeding group effective hemostasis elevated  
in 42.9% (9 of 21 patients) in the control group and 71.4% (20 of 28) in the main group. Operated 9 (42.9%) and  
7 (25%) patients, respectively. Overall mortality was 7 (33.3%) and 4 (14.3%) cases.  
In order to prevent bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis patients additionally had 1-3 sessions of EC or EL.  
The average re-ES sessions were carried out in 3-4 days. The progression of the various complications led to the  
transfer of 19 (18.6%) patients in the control group and 16 (13.4%) in the study group from functional class "B"  
to the class "C". The main reasons were growing of edematous-ascitic syndrome and progression of hepatocellular  
insufficiency. The class "C" progression of these complications observed in 14.7% (15 patients) and 6.7% (8), but  
it should be noted that by day 10-12 post-hemorrhagic rehabilitation from Class "C" in class "B "translated into 8  
(7.8%) and 19 (16%) patients. In general, groups of improvement identified in 21.6% of patients in the control  
group and 33.6% in the study group, the deterioration to the 41.2% and 23.5% of cases, stable at 37.3% and  
42.9% of patients.  
In our observations Child-Pugh scale in the class "A" amounted to 6,2 ± 0,1 points, on a scale of MELD (Model  
for End-Stage Liver Disease) - 9,1 ± 0,2 points. In the class "B» - 8,4 ± 0,3 and 12,4 ± 0,3 points, respectively. In the  
class “C” - 11,6 ± 0,3 and 18,2 ± 0,4 points. Determination of the MELD was performed in 69 patients (from 2011),  
and was of fundamental importance in defining the terms for radical treatment. In our study, these figures reflect  
the condition of patients in period of development of hemorrhagic syndrome. Class "A" - 11 (15.9%) patients,  
class "B" - 36 (52.2%) and Class "C" - 22 (31.9%).  
In 68.1% of cases the development of hemorrhagic syndrome in patients with LC is noted on the background  
of compensated and subcompensated disease with high short-term prognosis (3-month) survival (P <0,001),  
defined on a scale of MELD, and corresponds to the class "A" Child -Pugh - 15,9% of patients with index 9,1 ± 0,2  
points (MELD), class " B" - 52,2% (12,4 ± 0,3 points). At maintaining the functionality reserve of the hepatocytes  
on the background of cirrhosis (MELD <15; "A" and "B" Child-Pugh) leads to a favorable long-term prognosis  
without transplantation survival (P <0,001), while the rate of mortality even at the first episode of bleeding in this  
group reaches 11 , 1%, followed by a multiple increase in this index at relapse.  
Further the results of endoscopic interventions in the group of patients who were admitted in planned order  
were observed. In the control group 100% (108 cases) of interventions were carried out on the esophageal veins.  
In the main group in 6 of 120 (5%) cases routine vein ligation of the cardia of the stomach was performed.  
Bleeding after intervention noted in 6 (5.6%) of cases in the control group and in 2 (1.7%) in the study group.  
To cite this paper: Babadjanov A.Kh. Djumaniyazov D.A., Ruziboev S.A., Baibekov R.R. and Salimov U.R. 2016. Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions in Prevention of  
Gastroeshophageal Bleeding in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. J. Life Sci. Biomed., 6 (4): 94-99.  
95  
Emergency surgery was required only in 2 (1.9%) and 1 (0.8%) patients. Mortality in the control group was 0.9%,  
and in the there was no lethal outcome in the main group.  
Summing up the results of all interventions following can be noted. Endoscopic procedures efficiency was  
82.4% (173 of 210 patients) in control group and 90% (215 of 239) in the main group. Emergency operation after  
endoscopic manipulation was performed in 23 (11%) and 15 (6.3%) patients. Overall mortality was 10.5% (22  
patients) and 5% (12), respectively (Fig. 1).  
Table 1. The efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis and mortality rate, depending on the Child- Pugh functional class  
Control  
Main  
Index  
Functional class  
Functional class  
Total  
Total  
«А»  
18  
«В»  
«С»  
36  
«А»  
19  
«В»  
«С»  
45  
48  
102  
100%  
76  
55  
119  
100%  
101  
Total amount  
17.6% 47.1% 35.3%  
16 38 22  
88.9% 79.2% 61.1%  
10 14  
11.1% 20.8% 38.9%  
16.0% 46.2% 37.8%  
18 47 36  
94.7% 85.5% 80.0%  
Effective hemostasis  
74.5%  
26  
84.9%  
18  
2
1
5.3%  
0
8
9
Ineffective endoscopic hemostasis, or  
inability of intervention  
25.5%  
14  
14.5% 20.0%  
15.1%  
9
0
0.0%  
2
4
10  
27.8%  
9
3
5.5%  
8
6
13.3%  
5
Mortality  
8.3%  
10  
13.7%  
21  
0.0%  
1
7.6%  
14  
Dissection surgery’s  
Mortality (after surgery)  
General mortality  
11.1% 20.8% 25.0%  
20.6%  
7
5.3%  
0
14.5% 11.1%  
11.8%  
3
0
2
5
1
2
0.0%  
0
20.0% 55.6%  
15  
12.5% 41.7%  
33.3%  
21  
0.0%  
0
12.5% 40.0%  
21.4%  
12  
6
4
8
0.0%  
20.6%  
0.0%  
7.3%  
17.8%  
10.1%  
Figure 1. Short-term results of endoscopic interventions  
It should be noted that in the study group good hemostatic effect and tactics undertaken by post-  
hemorrhagic rehabilitation allowed to expand a greater degree opportunities for the use of combined-stage  
tactics. After only three weeks after the hemorrhage episode with an effective endoscopic hemostasis performed  
PSS was performed in 17 (8.1%) patients in the control and 59 (24.7%) in the study group.  
In the late period 319 patients were observed in both groups. Also, from the analysis of long-term results  
observation patients who were on a background of ineffective endoscopic hemostasis were performed various  
options for emergency uncoupling operations. In general 72 patients were excluded from the study.  
To cite this paper: Babadjanov A.Kh. Djumaniyazov D.A., Ruziboev S.A., Baibekov R.R. and Salimov U.R. 2016. Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions in Prevention of  
Gastroeshophageal Bleeding in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. J. Life Sci. Biomed., 6 (4): 94-99.  
96  
The main parameter for evaluating long-term results was the analysis of the haemorrhage recurrence. In  
view of decompressive effect of performed PSS in some patients, they were not included in to the study. Within  
one month after discharge 10 (8.2%) of 122 patients from the main group and 5 (4.2%) patients in of 118 in the  
study group were admitted to different clinics (Fig. 2).  
Figure 2. Frequency of rebleeding after endoscopic interventions  
Analysis of patients with conservative, including a Blackmore-Segstaken tube hemostasis is of a special  
interest. Of these 28 patients, bleeding in the three-year period of observation developed in 17 (60.7%), including  
13 (46.4%) in the periods up to a year after the initial episode.  
Due to mortality in the remote period, patients were divided into those with LC progression and ones with  
recurrence of hemorrhagic syndrome. In the various periods of follow up because of increasing liver failure died 5  
(4.1%) 15 (12.3%) in the control group and 3 (2.5%) 10 (8.5%) in the study group. Bleeding from 4 (3.3%) to 9  
(7.4%) and 2 (1.7%) to 4 (3.4%), respectively. In general, in control group in the remote period of up to 3 years,  
41 (33.6%) patients died due to increasing liver failure and 22 (18%) patients from hemorrhage. In the main  
group, the figures were lower and amounted to 24 (20.3%) and 1 (9.3%) patients, respectively. Mortality among  
patients with bleeding was 45.8% in the control group (22 deaths out of 48 patients) and 36.7% in the study  
group (11 out of 30 died).  
The analysis showed that: the proportion of patients with effective hemostasis within three years without  
recurrence only with performance of endoscopic procedures was 27% (33 patients) in the control group and  
54.2% (64 patients) in the study group. In the phased tactics with the performance of PSS after endoscopic  
interventions mentioned rates were: in the main group - 61.6% (109 patients) In the structure “no mortality” in  
patients with LC in the remote period (81 patients) with endoscopic interventions there was no recurrence of  
bleeding observed in 40.7% (33) cases in the control group and 68.1% (64 of 94) in the main group. In turn, in  
patients whith combined endoscopy plus PSS, not including those who died from progressive LC, absence of  
bleeding recurrence was 45.9% (in 45 of 98 patients) and 71.2% (102 out of 153 tracked at a remote period,  
excluding died from LC complications). In the group of patients that did not underwent any endoscopic  
procedures, and were receiveing only conservative therapy only in 3 (10.7%) cases it was possible to avoid  
recurrence , thise determines the therapeutic ineffectiveness of isolated attempts in the risk of recurrence reduce.  
DISCUSSION  
Stage care in the tactics of management of patients with LC with the threat of hemorrhagic syndrome encouraged  
by many hepatologycal schools. In countrys with developed transplant service minimally invasive intervention,  
such as endoscopic or endovascular manipulation, can extend the waiting period for a liver transplantation, as  
To cite this paper: Babadjanov A.Kh. Djumaniyazov D.A., Ruziboev S.A., Baibekov R.R. and Salimov U.R. 2016. Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions in Prevention of  
Gastroeshophageal Bleeding in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. J. Life Sci. Biomed., 6 (4): 94-99.  
97  
mortality from hemorrhagic syndrome on the waiting list exceeds 25%. For countries with a lack of opportunity  
of radical treatment, the risk of rebleading dictates necessity of optimization of therapeutic and preventive  
measures without considering the probability of of liver transplantation in the future. Studies have shown that the  
modern arsenal of endoscopic technologies ensures adequate hemostasis. But to improve the long-term results  
over a third of patients required to take additional preventive measures, as even a phased implementation  
ligation or sclerotherapy does not achieve complete eradication of veins. Against this background and different  
technical capabilities, combining preventive methods are used. In particular, endoscopic procedures are used as a  
means of influencing directly on the source of the bleeding, but decompressive effect is achived by performance of  
different portocaval bypass surgerys. These operations are divided into two groups: traditional and endovascular.  
The essence of transjugular intrahepatic shunting (Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting - TIPS) is in  
the combination of intrahepatic branches of the portal vein to the hepatic vein. Alternatively PSS, and TIPS can  
also be attributed to as partial, due to the possibility of creating different shunt diameters. In our view, PSS should  
still continue to be considered as an option method of portal decompression, especially in patients with  
ineffective pharmacologic and endoscopic treatment, and in the absence of indications for liver transplantation.  
he use of different options of endoscopic interventions, even with the dynamic control and with tje use of  
additional ligation sessions or sclerotherapy, allowed to achieve 78% annual survival rate. In the group of  
patients with PSS mentioned rates were: 88%. Survival at 24 months was only 54% in the endoscopy group,  
while the combined tactics improved this index up to 78%. In terms to 3 years of observation, the figures were  
34% versus 64% (P <0,001).  
In general, PSS should be carried out only by certain indications. For functional class "C" patients endoscopy  
remains a priority method of hemostasis and bleeding prevention. Assuming stabilization of patients state and  
transfer to functional classes A and B, the question of decompressive operations will be opened. In other cases it  
is advisable to use only minimally invasive techniques. In particular, endoscopic and endovascular interventions,  
since this group of patients due to severity of LC, are already regarded as potential candidates for radical  
treatment.  
CONCLUSIONS  
In 68.1% of cases hemorrhage development in cirrhotic patients is observed on the background of  
compensated and subcompensated course of the disease with a high forecast short-term (3-month) survival (P  
<0,001). Mentioned is defined by MELD scale. Class "A" on the Child-Pugh - corresponds to 15.9% of patients with  
index 9,1 ± 0,2 points, class “B” - 52,2% (12,4 ± 0,3 points).  
Maintained hepatocytes functional reserve on the background of cirrhosis (MELD <15 points and classes "A"  
and "B" on the Child-Pugh) leads to a favorable long-term prognosis of “without transplantation” survival (P  
<0,001), while the mortality rate on the first episode of bleeding in this group of patients reaches 11.1%, followed  
by a multiple increase in this index at relapse.  
Prognostic value of prophylactic endoscopic interventions is determined by the reduction of bleeding  
recurrence. So, using only conservative prophylactic methods in a period of up to 3 years of observation,  
complication recur in 60.7% of patients with post-hemorrhagic mortality indicator - 46.4%, while their  
implementation reduces these values to 18.0%, respectively.  
Modern opportunities of endoscopic technologies have significantly improved the results of treatment and  
prevention of varicose bleeding or the threat of its recurrence. In this landmark of commitment tactics, with a  
combination of traditional and minimally invasive decompressive surgery, allowed to increase the survival rates  
of patients from 80% to 88% - up to 1 year and 42% to 64% - to 3 years of follow-up.  
Acknowledgements  
This work was supported by “Republican Specialized Centre of Surgery» named after V.Vakhidov. Tashkent.  
Uzbekistan.  
Competing interests  
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.  
To cite this paper: Babadjanov A.Kh. Djumaniyazov D.A., Ruziboev S.A., Baibekov R.R. and Salimov U.R. 2016. Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions in Prevention of  
Gastroeshophageal Bleeding in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. J. Life Sci. Biomed., 6 (4): 94-99.  
98  
REFERENCES  
1. Figueiredo A., Romero-Bermejo F., Perdigoto R., Marcelino P. The End-Organ Impairment in Liver Cirrhosis:  
Appointments for Critical Care. Critical Care Research and Practice, 2012. - vol. 2012. - ID 539412. - 13 p.  
2. Wiegand J., Berg T. The etiology, diagnosis and prevention of liver cirrhosis-part 1 of a series on liver  
cirrhosis. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int., 2013. - vol. 110, N 6. - pp. 8591.  
3. Scherzinger A.G., Sokolov S.B., Melkumov A.B., Manuk'yan V.G. Gastric varices in patients with portal  
hypertension: diagnosis and treatment. Ann. Surg. Hepatology. - 2010. - XV, №3. - P.84-94.  
Шерцингер А.Г., Жигалова С.Б., Мелкумов А.Б., Манукьян В.Г. Варикозное расширение вен желудка у  
больных портальной гипертензией: диагностика и лечение. Анн. хирург. гепатологии. - 2010. - Т.XV,  
№3. - С.84-94. [Article in Russian]  
4.  
Nazyrov F.G., Devyatov A.V., Babadjanov A.K. Combined analysis of the results and the competitive prospects  
of portosystemic shunting in patients with liver cirrhosis. Ann. surgeon. Hepatology. - 2015. - T.XV, №3. -  
S.36-41.  
Назыров Ф.Г., Девятов А.В., Бабаджанов А.Х. Сводный анализ результатов и конкурентные перспективы  
портосистемного шунтирования у больных циррозом печени Анн. хирург. гепатологии. - 2015. - Т.XV,  
№3. - С.36-41. [Article in Russian]  
5. Stine J.G, Shah P.M., Cornella S.L., Rudnick S.R., Ghabril M.S., Stukenborg G.J., Northup P.G. Portal vein  
Hepatol. 2015 Nov 28;7(27):2774-2780.  
6. Garcia-Tsao G., Lim J. Management and treatment of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension:  
recommendations from the department of veterans affairs hepatitis C resource center program and the  
national hepatitis C program. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009. - vol. 104, N 7. - pp. 18021829.  
7. Romcea AA, Tanţău M, Seicean A, Pascu O. The etiology of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic  
patients. Clujul Med. 2013; 86(1):21-3.  
8. Nazyrov F.G, Sokolov A.S., Devyatov A.V., Sayapin S.N. Analysis of the status and prospects of development  
of transformed probes used to stop bleeding from the varices of the esophagus. Surgery. 2010; 12: 58-64.  
Назыров Ф.Г., Соколова А.С., Девятов А.В., Саяпин С.Н. Анализ состояния и перспективы развития  
трансформируемых зондов для остановки кровотечений из варикозно-расширенных вен  
пищевода. Хирургия. - 2010. - №12. - С.58-64. [Article in Russian]  
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Dec 7:1-11.  
10. Senzolo M., M Sartori T., Rossetto V., Burra P., Cillo U., Boccagni P., Gasparini D., Miotto D., Simioni P.,  
Jul;32(6):919-27.  
11. Escorsell À., Pavel O., Cárdenas A., Morillas R., Llop E., Villanueva C., Garcia-Pagán J.C., Bosch J.; Variceal  
variceal bleeding: A multicenter RCT. Hepatology. 2015 Nov 24. doi: 10.  
12. Dzidzava I.I,. Long-term results of surgical correction of portal hypertension and prognostic factors for  
survival in patients with cirrhosis: Thesis of candidate of medical science. Saint Petersburg, 2010. 48 p.  
Дзидзава И.И. Отдаленные результаты хирургической коррекции портальной гипертензии и  
прогностические факторы выживаемости у больных циррозом печени.: Автореф. дис. ... докт. мед.  
наук. - Санкт-Петербург. - 2010. - 48 с. [Article in Russian]  
13. Holster I.L., Tjwa E.T., Moelker A., Wils A., Hansen B.E., Vermeijden J.R., Scholten P., van Hoek B., Nicolai J.J.,  
Kuipers E.J., Pattynama P.M., van Buuren H.R.. Covered TIPS vs endoscopic therapyꢀ+ꢀΒ-blocker for  
prevention of variceal rebleeding. Hepatology. 2015 Oct 30. doi: 10.1002/hep.28318.  
To cite this paper: Babadjanov A.Kh. Djumaniyazov D.A., Ruziboev S.A., Baibekov R.R. and Salimov U.R. 2016. Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions in Prevention of  
Gastroeshophageal Bleeding in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. J. Life Sci. Biomed., 6 (4): 94-99.  
99